Live AU Certificate Prices Twitter Linkedin-in Youtube Buy and Sell Global RECs Contact

How to avoid costly energy project mistakes in manufacturing.

Share this article

In today’s manufacturing environment, making the wrong investment decision is costly due to competition for capital, market share, and the allocation of scarce human resources. Projects like electrification and efficiency upgrades can be complex and resource-intensive. Not only that, but there are usually multiple options with different costs and benefits, and the manufacturing environment is constantly changing.  

Worse still, some organisations base these important decisions on incomplete data.  

A well-executed feasibility study based on measured data removes that uncertainty, providing clear technical and financial insight before decisions are made. This ensures projects deliver real, measurable outcomes. 

What is a feasibility study? 

A feasibility study assesses whether a proposed project – such as electrification, energy efficiency upgrade or renewable integration – is technically viable, financially sound and operationally practical. Northmore Gordon’s approach goes beyond standard engineering modelling to also consider site-specific operational constraints, the regulatory and business environment and detailed financial analysis including ROI and funding pathways. This enables confident, investment-grade decision-making. 

Why feasibility studies matter 

Energy and infrastructure projects often require significant capital, and the consequences of poor planning compound quickly. A well-scoped feasibility study identifies true project costs, including hidden risks, validates realistic savings and highlights funding and environmental certificate opportunities. The Australian Energy Efficiency Council notes that well-executed projects can reduce energy costs by 10-30%, but only when properly scoped and implemented. 

Without detailed analysis, projects frequently underperform, or worse, the wrong project is selected. Good feasibility studies provide accurate analysis based on measured data, and consider a range of risks including energy savings being realised, energy price variability, external market conditions, current business performance and future business direction. They also allow organisations to move from reactive upgrades to strategic decarbonisation, prioritising initiatives based on environmental and energy targets, emissions reduction potential, cost-effectiveness, operational impact and future business direction. 

Organisations that bypass feasibility analysis often face overestimated savings, budget overruns from incomplete scope, wrong equipment selection, lost funding or certificate opportunities and compliance gaps. In many cases, businesses end up reinvesting to fix poorly planned systems, effectively paying twice. 

Why feasibility studies matter for industry 

Industrial environments are complex, with tight margins, resource constraints, and uptime pressures. Poorly planned projects can disrupt production, increase maintenance costs and result in underperforming assets. For CFOs and facility managers, a feasibility study answers the critical questions before capital is committed: Will this solution work on our site? What are the operational risks? What is the real return? 

Manufacturing situations that benefit most 

Feasibility studies deliver value in all manufacturing facilities at any time. However their impact, and the energy efficiency (or productivity) benefit is super-charged when  

What makes Northmore Gordon different 

Northmore Gordon delivers senior expertise without the bureaucracy of large firms or the limitations of volume providers. 

Our engineering team conducts detailed system modelling and technology-specific analysis that goes beyond standard approaches. With 15+ years of Australian experience, we integrate business needs and an understanding of the regulatory environment into every engagement. Our financial modelling covers ROI and scenario analysis, certificate optimisation and funding pathways. Clients work directly with senior engineers, no account management layers, faster decisions and clearer advice. 

Case study 

In a recent manufacturing electrification project, Northmore Gordon identified a viable technical pathway, uncovered significant certificate revenue opportunities and redesigned the system to reduce capital cost. The project delivered both emissions reduction and strong financial returns, outcomes that would not have been achieved without detailed upfront analysis. 

Explore more case studies on our website. 

Conclusion 

Feasibility studies are not optional, but well-rounded feasibility studies can be rare. They are essential for reducing risk, improving outcomes and navigating regulatory requirements. They enable organisations to invest with confidence, avoid costly mistakes and maximise financial and environmental outcomes. At Northmore Gordon, feasibility studies help organisations achieve better results with less risk, less waste and less uncertainty. 

You may also like:

Welcome to our August & September 2026 Compliance Update.
Australian Certificate Markets – August 2026 Update 
Where’s the value in renewable heat?

Latest Updates

ASRS Group 3: are you in scope and don’t know it?
September 18, 2026

Correct as at 13 September 2026.  If your company is a large proprietary company, you

Read More »
Beyond annual matching: The evolution of time-stamped RECs
August 18, 2026

For more than a decade, Renewable Energy Certificates (RECsI-RECs, GOs, TIGRsTradeable Instrument for Global Renewables (TIGR) Registry is an online platform for tracking and transferring renewable energy certificates (RECS), enabling developers to generate,verify and sell RECs. The registry is run by APX, a US company that provides infrastructure for environmental markets around the world., LGCs, ZNECs, J-Credits) have

Read More »
Solar irrigation upgrades: Don’t let certificate funding go unclaimed 
August 10, 2026

Irrigation pumps are one of the biggest hidden costs on an Australian farm. In particular, if

Read More »
SRES expansion: STC eligibility to increase from 100 kW to 1 MW from October 2026
August 6, 2026

The Australian Government has announced a major expansion of the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme, increasing

Read More »

Get in touch

Australia

1300 854 561 (Advisory)

1300 878 500 (Certificates)

Melbourne

Suite 1, Level 4

607 Bourke Street

Melbourne

VIC 3000

Singapore

+65 6690 2480



Singapore

1 Keong Saik Road,

Singapore 089109

Stay up to date

mailto:%20info@northmoregordon.com https://twitter.com/northmoregordon https://www.linkedin.com/company/northmore-gordon-pty-ltd https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdGc6mABpL2XxVUCrVjYQ1g

Alternatively, complete the form and we will be in

touch with you.

https://northmoregordon.com
Services
Sectors
Upgrades
Certificates
Government Schemes
Helpful Links

What is a feasibility study according to Northmore Gordon?

A feasibility study assesses whether a proposed project—such as electrification, an energy efficiency upgrade, or renewable integration—is technically viable, financially sound and operationally practical. Northmore Gordon's approach goes beyond standard engineering modelling to also consider site-specific operational constraints, the regulatory and business environment, and detailed financial analysis including ROI and funding pathways, enabling confident, investment-grade decision-making.

Why do feasibility studies matter for manufacturing energy projects?

Energy and infrastructure projects often require significant capital, and poor planning consequences compound quickly. A well-scoped feasibility study identifies true project costs, including hidden risks, validates realistic savings, and highlights funding and environmental certificate opportunities. The Australian Energy Efficiency Council notes that well-executed projects can reduce energy costs by 10-30%, but only when properly scoped and implemented.

What happens when organisations skip feasibility analysis?

According to the article, organisations that bypass feasibility analysis often face overestimated savings, budget overruns from incomplete scope, wrong equipment selection, lost funding or certificate opportunities, and compliance gaps. In many cases, businesses end up reinvesting to fix poorly planned systems, effectively paying twice.

What key questions does a feasibility study answer for CFOs and facility managers?

For CFOs and facility managers, a feasibility study answers critical questions before capital is committed: Will this solution work on our site? What are the operational risks? What is the real return?

In which manufacturing situations do feasibility studies deliver the most value?

Feasibility studies have a super-charged impact when: old equipment needs upgrading; the production mix has changed, leaving some equipment operating less efficiently; production output has changed (higher or lower), resulting in poorly matched utility systems; there are structural shifts in the price differential between electricity and gas; the business has energy or carbon targets that are not being met; the business is looking for a step change in performance; or at the design stage, before a new plant is even built.

What makes Northmore Gordon's feasibility study approach different from other providers?

Northmore Gordon delivers senior expertise without the bureaucracy of large firms or the limitations of volume providers. Its engineering team conducts detailed system modelling and technology-specific analysis that goes beyond standard approaches, with 15+ years of Australian experience integrating business needs and regulatory understanding into every engagement. Its financial modelling covers ROI and scenario analysis, certificate optimisation, and funding pathways, and clients work directly with senior engineers with no account management layers, resulting in faster decisions and clearer advice.

What was the outcome of Northmore Gordon's manufacturing electrification case study?

In a recent manufacturing electrification project, Northmore Gordon identified a viable technical pathway, uncovered significant certificate revenue opportunities, and redesigned the system to reduce capital cost. The project delivered both emissions reduction and strong financial returns—outcomes that would not have been achieved without detailed upfront analysis.

Who wrote this article and when was it published?

The article was written by Craig Morgan and published on June 26, 2026.

According to the knowledge base, what mistake should be avoided when estimating combined savings from multiple energy measures?

A critical error is adding individually estimated savings when two measures affect the same load—for example, in a compressed-air system, a proposed replacement compressor should be assessed against the demand expected after leaks are repaired, not against the original full load, since adding two independent estimates can significantly overstate the combined result.

What should come first when planning a manufacturing energy project, according to the knowledge base?

The knowledge base states that a frequent mistake is selecting equipment or technology before understanding what service the manufacturing process actually requires. The correct approach is to treat energy as an input to the production process, establish what decision the data needs to support first, and map major production lines, utility systems and shifts to meters and production records before identifying credible improvement opportunities.

Images on This Page